Occupational therapy
is a hands on profession; however, many of the skills one needs are hard to
test on paper. My school has chosen to test these skills through lab
practicals. Typically, students are paired up and told to perform different
skills on each other. Ideally clients would be brought in, but that is rarely
practical and sometimes unethical.
There are many
benefits to lab practicals (especially compared to paper testing), but there
are drawbacks. One is they are time consuming to perform. Often it leaves
students hanging around the building, sometimes for hours. Another issue is the
student being the client knows what the student practitioner is looking for and
typically makes it easy. In one of my practicals my "client" always
knew what position to get into, and sometimes naturally got into that position
without me asking. That is not going to happen in real life. Finally, these
situations are very controlled. Even when the "client" is instructed
to act up they are still usually on the practitioner's side. Even if in the
clinic, one is lucky enough to have the perfect client there are still the
issue of distractions from other staff and clients as well as missing
materials. Don't get me wrong I appreciate my school giving me the time and
encouragement, but I wish there was a more realistic way to test. I guess we
are slowly building our way to fieldwork. It would probably be too overwhelming
otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment